MUELLER CAME, SPOKE & INDICTED TRUMP!

by Paul-Revere-Rides, posted in Political Blog Posts

.

For Donations – “ANY” Amount

$1.00

 

.

.

Our Newest (363rd) Podcast — ( 9-min./03-sec.) —

For Podcast Playback —

Click On The “White” Arrow of Either The Top or Bottom AUDIO Bars —

Or —

Go To URL — http://PaulRevereRides.Blog

Or —

For Our Latest 6 Podcasts —

Go To URL — http://PaulRevereRides.Com —

Or —

For All 363 Podcast Episodes —

Go To Our Feeds —

http://feeds.feedburner.com/PaulrevereridesBlog —

Or —

http://feeds.feedburner.com/Paulrevererides

.

.

 
No, Mueller Wasn’t Swashbuckling Errol Flynn Or John Bon Jovi!
.
No, He Wasn’t Billy Dee Williams Or Even Bruce Springsteen!
.
No, He Wasn’t FDR, JFK, RFK, MLK, AOC, Or Even Eminem!
.
But, He Did Show Up, He Spoke, He Answered & He Nailed Trump!
.
So, All Of You A-Holes Out There Within The Sound Of My Podcast – 
.
If You Don’t Like Facts & Damning Revelations – 
.
But, Instead Like Cheesey Reality TV Shows With Fabulous Punchlines – 
.
You Obviously Either (A) Voted For Trump – OR – (B) Are Living In A Trailer Park!
.
Mueller was asked several pivotal questions – among all of the others.
.
They are as follows – as taken from House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler’s questioning of Robert Mueller.
.
Question No. 1 — [From Jerry Nadler]  “The president has repeatedly said claimed that your report found that there was no obstruction and that it completely & totally exonerated him. But that is not what your report said, is it?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Correct.  That is NOT what the report said.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “And what about total exoneration – did you actually totally exonerate the president?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “No!”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “Now, in fact, your report expressly states that it does not exonerate the president.”
.
Mueller Responds:  “It does”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “And your investigation actually found multiple acts by the president that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations. Is that correct?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Correct.”
.
————-  Nadler continues:  “Now, Director Mueller, can you explain in plain terms what that finding means so that the American people can understand it?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Well, the finding indicates that the president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed.”
.
Question No. 2 — Nadler, reading directly from the Mueller Report — “If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “Now does that say there was no obstruction?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “No!”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “In fact, you were unable to conclude the president did not commit obstruction of justice.  Is that correct?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Well, we, at the outset determined that – we, uh – when it came to the president’s culpability – we needed to go forward – only after taking into account – the OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) opinion that indicated that a president – a sitting president – cannot be indicted.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “So the report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction of justice.  Is that correct?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “That is correct.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “But under Dept. of Justice policy the president could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice crimes after he leaves office, is that correct?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “That’s true.”
.
Question No. 3 — [Nadler]  “Did the president refuse to be interviewed by you & your team?
.
Mueller Responds:  “Yes.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “And is it true that you tried for more than a year to secure an interview with the president?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Yes.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “Is it true that you and your team advised the president’s lawyers that an interivew with the president is vital to our investigation?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Yes.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “And is it true that you also stated that it is in the interests of the presidency and the public for an interview to take place?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Yes.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “But the president still refused to sit for an interview by you or your team?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “True.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “And did you also ask him to provide you with written answers to questions on the 10 possible episodes of obstruction of justice crimes involving him.”
.
Mueller Responds:  “Yes.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  “Did he provide any answer to a single question about whether he had engaged in obstruction of justice crimes?”
.
Mueller Responds:  “I would have to check on that.  I am not certain.”
.
————–  Nadler continues:  He asks Mueller to characterize Trump’s answers to the Mueller team’s written questions.
.
In Robert Mueller’s own words — “Were Generally Not Truthful”.
.
And here’s another interesting question during Judiciary Chairman Nadler’s questioning of Robert Mueller:
.
————– Nadler:  “Did your investigation find that the Russian government perceived that it would benefit from one of the candidates winning?”
.
Mueller’s Response:  “Yes.”
.
————– Nadler:  “And which candidate would that be?”
.
Mueller’s Response:  “Well, it would be Trimp, uh, — Trump”

.

Let’s Begin An Impeachment INQUIRY!

 

...

http://feeds.feedburner.com/Paulrevererides — “FEED” — For ALL Blog-Posts + Podcasts

.

OR

.

http://feeds.feedburner.com/PaulrevereridesBlog — Alternate “FEED”

.

363 Podcasts — (9,705) All-Time / Total Listens — 833 Blog Posts

.

https://twitter.com/paulrevererider — OR — https://www.facebook.com/roughrydrz